CHILDREN
Increase in risks of hyperactivity
Dr. Herta Hafer demonstrated that one of the major causes of children hyperactivity is to be found in the phosphates commonly present in food and drinks. Additionally, several scientific studies have shown that the blood-brain barrier (a protective network of blood vessels and cells that filters blood flowing to the brain) becomes porous under the impact of Pulsed ElectroMagnetic Radiation (PEMR). A test was conclusively conducted on 7 children below the age of puberty in which all phosphates were eliminated from their diet and all CRT screens in their homes were protected. Within 6 to 8 weeks, they all recovered.
Developmental and behavioral disturbances
Prof. Marcel Rufo, a French child psychiatrist, showed that children below the age of puberty exposed 40 minutes or more to a CRT screen saw their school achievements divided by 3, and their memory capacity divided by 5. Tests conducted on lab rats showed an alteration of the neuro-endocrinian development when exposed to CRTs that proved irreversible if the exposure extended to puberty age. Conversely, such adverse effects did not occur when the computers they were exposed to were equipped with the EMF-Bioshield® protective elements.
Inability to memorize (impact on scholastic achievements)
Tests conducted with the German device DFM-VEGA showed that brain waves between the left and the right sides become flat in children from 8 to 10 exposed to PEMR for 20 minutes without protection. On the other hand, they remain normal even after 40 minutes of exposure to PEMR from computers equipped with protection. Doctors think these blockages are due to an electromagnetic saturation of the corpus callosum which bridges the lobes of information acquisition and registration.
WOMEN
Risk of miscarriage
Several physiological and epidemiological studies have shown a very significant increase (+100%) in miscarriages in women who spent more than 4 hours a day exposed to PEMR. Up until then, however, none had tried to find the original cause of the miscarriage.
Risk of anomalies in the fœtus
>>In 1988, Dr. M. Goldhaber (USA) published in the "American Journal of Industrial Medicine" a report on the risk of a 40% increase in foetus anomalies in pregnant women exposed to the PEMR of CRT screens more than 4 hours a day.
>>At the 10th Congress on Occupational Health (Amsterdam, 1992), a very significant increase in breach of human DNA exposed in vitro to the PEMR of a CRT computer screen was revealed. Conversely, the same type of breach was absent in front of screens protected by EMF-Bioshield®.
>>At the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Congress (Hongkong, 1998), it was reported that cultures of human testicle biopsies exposed to the PEMR of CRT screens suffered a 300% increase in cellular death rate in 24 hours in front of non-protected screen, while the death rate remained normal when exposed to a similar but protected screen.
MEN
Change in libido
Several studies under way indicate a loss in testosterone production (and therefore in libido) in young men who spend more than 4 hours a day exposed to the PEMR of non protected CRT screens, and a normalization in more or less 2 weeks after the EMF-Bioshield® protective elements were put on their screen.
Biological and physiological effects on biopsy cultures of human testicles
At the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Congress (Hongkong, 1998), it was reported that cultures of human testicle biopsies exposed to the PEMR of CRT screens suffered a 300% increase in cellular death rate in 24 hours in front of non-protected screen, while the death rate remained normal when exposed to a similar but protected screen.
EVERYBODY
Inexplicable chronic fatigue
>>Prof. V. Bondarovskaïa (University of Kiev-Ukraine) demonstratd that human adults irradiated in Chernobyl reached extreme fatigue after 4 hours in front of a CRT screen, and in contrast could work for 8 hours straight when sitting in front of computer under protection.
>>Dr. Paul Nogier was able to show that the energetic field of a human adult is 75% destroyed after 8 hours of exposure to the PEMR of a CRT screen, which means that 12 hours away from the screen are needed for it to be rebuilt. Compare this to the same people exposed to the same screens equipped with protection who suffered no such destruction.
Neuropsychological disorders (migraine, insomnia, nervousness, violence)
>>In 1989 the WHO (World Health Organization) published the works of Swedish Profs. Johansson & Aronsson which showed an inversion of the curves of adrenaline excretion (adrenaline is a stress hormone which also causes nervousness, agressivity and violence) in the urine of human adults after the 4th hour of exposure to a CRT screen.
>>In 1994, 79 French occupational physicians signed a report which showed a significant increase in neuro-psychological troubles in human adults after 4 hours of exposure to the PEMR of CRT screens.
>>In 2001, Dr.V.M-B, another French occupational physician showed an inversion of the balance between sodium and potassium in the urine of human adults after 4 hours of exposure to non-protected screens, while no such inversion happened in people exposed to protected screens.
Decrease in activity of the immune system
>>Dr. I. Petrovskaïa, from the Immunology and Genetics Institute of Kiev-Ukraine, showed that the immune system activity of people irradiated in Tchernobyl was very sensitive to PEMR, and that its efficiency decreased up to 50% in 4 hours spent in front of unprotected CRT screens. Conversely, the same people exposed to screens under protection showed activity of their immune system similar to that of people not exposed at all to any screen.
Inhibition of the effectiveness of medical or therapeutic treatments
>>A 25 year old woman came into a Swiss clinic to treat a recurring cystitis, a nervous breakdown and chronic fatigue. The doctor in charge checked her condition with a machine known by its French acronym of DDFAO ("Détection-Diagnostic Fonctionnel Assisté par Ordinateur" or "Computer-Assisted Functional Detection and Diagnosis"), which showed a functional deficit in all her organs. He prescribed a treatment, and 10 weeks later she was back for a checkup... which produced the same results. He increased the dosage in treatment, to no avail. 10 weeks later, the patient was back with no improvement in her condition. It then occured to him to ask her a crucial question: was she spending time in front of a computer? The answer was "Why, yes doctor. 8 hours a day!" He then told her to protect her screen, maintain the treatment he had prescribed in the first place, and come back 6 weeks later. When she came back, she was completely healed. What happened was that she wasn't healed by the protection put on the computer, but by the fact that this protection shielded her body and allowed it to respond to the treatment prescribed by the doctor. As long as she remained exposed to the PEMR of her computer, her body could not heal. Similar results have been observed with classical as well as alternative therapies. (Documented evidence of this case is available).